Повсякденність як модус соціального буття

Abstract

У статті досліджено повсякденність як форму існування соціальної реальності, характерні ознаки якої − зв’язок із практичною діяльністю, прагматичність, комунікативність, персоніфікація, інтерсуб’єктивність, повторюваність, стереотипність, зрозумілість. Осмислення соціального змісту, типів та форм повсякденності, структури й внутрішніх елементів у їх взаємозв’язку дає змогу розглядати повсякденне життя людей як одну з форм існування соціальної реальності. The article is devoted research of everyday life as form of existence of social reality. The complexity of determination of everyday life is predefined by absence of clear formalization and permanent institutes and mechanisms of discovering. The everyday life is found in the system of intersections, connections, relationships that connect different areas of the lives world. It includes a wide range of objects, relations and phenomena that are difficult to limit and rank by the degree of significance. The everyday life is not static, forever set environment, but it is characterized by variability, constructivity and creativity. Human does not only depend on the financial and material environment a particular historical time, but also influences it, inculcates certain innovations in everyday life, which objectified in the newly created material things, contribute to the emergence of a new system of connections and relationships. The everyday life is part of social reality, some spiritual and mental integrity and material, a necessary condition for social life that takes place in the social space and time in the fields of life, work and leisure through various activities. The comprehension of social content, types and forms of everyday life, structure and internal elements, in their intercommunication allows to examine everyday life of people as one of forms of existence of social reality. During life of man the everyday life is changing, as are changing goal of activity and condition of its achievement. Human existence is full of responsibilities − to itself, family, society, state, humanity. The aggregate of anxieties and duties creates “tension of everyday life”, which, in opinion of many scientists, in all times was and remains impetus to civilization and rationalization. The everyday life appears as the sphere of empiric life of man the characteristic signs of which is connection with practical activity, pragmatism, communicative, personification, intersubjectivity, repetition, stereotype, clearness. As a set of temporal and topological human experience the everyday life is realized in the space-time coordinates. The main functions of everyday life are preservation, survival, reproduction of human, society and culture. At mediation of everyday life, stability of society and broadcast of socio-cultural experience is achieved, but a sphere of uneveryday life provides innovations and socio-cultural transformations.