Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://evnuir.vnu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/29567
Title: Culture of Ukrainian Scientific Language: Oral and Written Forms of Professional Communication
Authors: Kostusiak, Nataliia
Hromyk, Larysa
Hrytsevych, Yurii
Kryskiv, Myroslava
Sydorenko, Olha
Shumenko, Olha
Bibliographic description (Ukraine): Kostusiak, N., Hromyk, L., Hrytsevych, Y., Kryskiv, M., Sydorenko, O., & Shumenko, O. (2025). Culture of Ukrainian Scientific Language: Oral and Written Forms of Professional Communication. Journal of Cultural Analysis and Social Change, 10(2), 4779–4788. https://doi.org/10.64753/jcasc.v10i2.2339
Journal/Collection: Journal of Cultural Analysis and Social Change
Issue: 2
Volume: 10
Issue Date: 25-Nov-2025
Date of entry: 28-Nov-2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64753/jcasc.v10i2.2339
Keywords: Scientific style
Ukrainian scientific language
Academic rhetoric
Rhetorical skil
Academic writing
Professional communication
Intercultural communication
Language norms
Culture of the Ukrainian language
Page range: 4779–4788
Abstract: The article comprehensively analyzes the modern Ukrainian scientific language in its oral and written forms with an emphasis on the internal organization, functional-stylistic, lexical, grammatical, communicative pragmatic features of texts of various genres, as well as in plane of academic ethics and the implementation of speech strategies and tactics, which enabled a multidimensional interpretation of the object under study. The focus is made on typical models of professional communication in the scientific field report, scientific message, dispute, monograph, article, theses, etc., their linguistic (lexical, morphological, and syntactic units), compositional and logical structure. Normative and non-normative words and their compounds, attested in scientific works of various genres and in oral monological and dialogical professional speech, are highlighted. Deviations from the stylistic norms of the Ukrainian language are identified and described, with an emphasis on stylistic figures and tropes, the sphere of expression of which is mainly oral professional speech. The specificity of lexical units that serve as a means of linguistic manipulation in disputes, as well as those that give emotionality, expressiveness, unorthodoxy to public speeches, and attract the attention of listeners, is emphasized. It is traced that the oral and written forms of scientific language, despite the presence of common features, in particular, objectivity, accuracy, argumentation, etc., have a number of different parameters. The oral form of scientific language is characterized by extensive syntactic variation, spontaneity, and the presence of some elements that give speech emotionality. In contrast, written works of various genres are characterized by a higher level of completeness, normativity, and a clear, logically and structurally motivated construction of sentences. It was found that mastery of the norms of the Ukrainian scientific language, a high level of professional communication culture, and skillful use of vocabulary serve as important factors in forming the image of a modern highly qualified researcher who is able to analyze and objectively evaluate the achievements of specialists in a certain field, effectively argue own position, and present own research results in an orderly, accurate, and understandable manner.
URI: https://evnuir.vnu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/29567
References (Ukraine): Bagan, M. (2019). Clichés in modern Ukrainian scientific discourse: cultural-linguistic and communicative aspects. Grammatical space of modern linguistic Ukrainian studies. To Kateryna Hryhorivna Gorodenska. Institute of Ukrainian Language of the NAS of Ukraine, Dmytro Burago Publishing House, pp. 367–374.
Gorodenska, K. (2001). Syntactic specificity of the Ukrainian scientific language. Ukrainian Terminology and Modernity, IV, 11–14.
Gorodenska, K. (2025). Renormalization in word formation of the Ukrainian literary language: causes, main manifestations, consequences. Ukrainian Language, 2, 71-84. https://doi.org/10.15407/ukrmova2025.02.071
Horoshkina, O., & Gruba, T. (2023). Ukrainian scientific language: theory and practice: teaching and methodological manual. Sumy: University book.
Koloiz, Zh. (2018). Academic writing and rhetoric. Kryvyi Rih: KDPU.
Kostusiak, N. (2021). Academic rhetoric. Lutsk: Nadstyria.
Kostusiak, N. (2025). Dynamic processes in Ukrainian scientific language expression. Scientific notes of V. I. Vernadsky Taurida National University. Series: Philology. Journalism, 36(75(4)), 50–55. https://doi.org/10.32782/2710-4656/2025.4.1/09.
Kostusiak, N., Shulska, N., Kozlova, T., Lynnyk, Y., Slashchuk, A., Musiichuk, T. (2022). Features of public communication: Rhetorical skill and language manipulation. AD ALTA: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 12(2), XХІХ, 208–213. http://www.magnanimitas.cz/ADALTA/120229/papers/A_36.pdf.
Kostusiak, N., Shulska, N., Mamosiuk, O., Polyvach, M., Kauza, I., Zavarynska, I. (2023). Variant paradigm of Ukrainian nouns in the context of codification, modern media and scientific speech. AD ALTA: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 13(1), XХХІІ, 105–114. http://www.magnanimitas.cz/ADALTA/130132/papers/A_20.pdf.
Kots, T. (2024). Modern Ukrainian scientific text in the dimension of dynamic stability of literary norm. Scientific Notes of V. I. Vernadsky Taurida National University. Series: Philology. Journalism, 35(74(5)), 26–31. https://doi.org/10.32782/2710-4656/2024.5.1/05.
Novruzaliyeva, S. (2024). Priorities for success in academic communication. AD ALTA: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 14(1), 257–261. https://www.magnanimitas.cz/ADALTA/140140/papers/A_43.pdf.
Pisarska, N., Zaveryushchenko, M., & Lukhina, M. (2023). Semantic-syntactic organization of scientific style. Scientific Notes of V. I. Vernadsky Taurida National University. Series: Philology. Journalism, 34(73(5)), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.32782/2710-4656/2023.5/05.
Romanchenko, A. (2019). Elite linguistic personality in the space of scientific discourse: communicative aspects. Odesa: Odessa National University named after I. I. Mechnikov.
Seligey, P. (2016). Light and shadows of scientific style. Kyiv: Kyiv-Mohyla Academy Publishing House.
Selivanova, O. O. (2008). Modern linguistics: trends and problems. Poltava: Dovkilya-Kyiv.
Semenog, O. (2010). Culture of the scientific Ukrainian language. Kyiv: Academy.
Serazhim, K. S. (2003). Discourse as a sociolinguistic phenomenon of the modern communicative space (based on the material of the political variety of Ukrainian mass information discourse). [PhD dissertation]. Kyiv.
Shabat-Savka, S. T. (2014). Category of communicative intention in the Ukrainian language. Chernivtsi: Bukrek.
Tkachuk, O., & Nakonechna, B. (2018). Modern Ukrainian scientific speech: a textbook. Ivano-Frankivsk: Publisher G. M. Kushnir.
Ukrainian spelling (2019). Kyiv: Scientific opinion.
Turko, O. (2025). Word order as a means of linguistic influence: communicative and pragmatic aspects. Transcarpathian Philological Studies, 41(2), 55-59. https://doi.org/10.32782/tps2663-4880/2025.41.2.9.
Venhryniuk, M. (2025). Academic writing through the lens of narrative: The case of science popularization in the works of Robert Sapolsky. Transcarpathian Philological Studies, 41(1), 34–39. https://doi.org/10.32782/tps2663- 4880/2025.41.1.6.
Verbych, S. (2025). The onymic space of the modern Ukrainian language: intra- and extra-linguistic factors of stable functioning. Ukrainian Language, 2, 94-105. https://doi.org/10.15407/ukrmova2025.02.094
Content type: Article
Appears in Collections:Наукові роботи (FFG)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
JCASC-025-148110(2)4779-4788.pdf265,19 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.