Будь ласка, використовуйте цей ідентифікатор, щоб цитувати або посилатися на цей матеріал: https://evnuir.vnu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/29567
Повний запис метаданих
Поле DCЗначенняМова
dc.contributor.authorKostusiak, Nataliia-
dc.contributor.authorHromyk, Larysa-
dc.contributor.authorHrytsevych, Yurii-
dc.contributor.authorKryskiv, Myroslava-
dc.contributor.authorSydorenko, Olha-
dc.contributor.authorShumenko, Olha-
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-28T11:24:55Z-
dc.date.available2025-11-28T11:24:55Z-
dc.date.issued2025-11-25-
dc.identifier.citationKostusiak, N., Hromyk, L., Hrytsevych, Y., Kryskiv, M., Sydorenko, O., & Shumenko, O. (2025). Culture of Ukrainian Scientific Language: Oral and Written Forms of Professional Communication. Journal of Cultural Analysis and Social Change, 10(2), 4779–4788. https://doi.org/10.64753/jcasc.v10i2.2339uk_UK
dc.identifier.urihttps://evnuir.vnu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/29567-
dc.description.abstractThe article comprehensively analyzes the modern Ukrainian scientific language in its oral and written forms with an emphasis on the internal organization, functional-stylistic, lexical, grammatical, communicative pragmatic features of texts of various genres, as well as in plane of academic ethics and the implementation of speech strategies and tactics, which enabled a multidimensional interpretation of the object under study. The focus is made on typical models of professional communication in the scientific field report, scientific message, dispute, monograph, article, theses, etc., their linguistic (lexical, morphological, and syntactic units), compositional and logical structure. Normative and non-normative words and their compounds, attested in scientific works of various genres and in oral monological and dialogical professional speech, are highlighted. Deviations from the stylistic norms of the Ukrainian language are identified and described, with an emphasis on stylistic figures and tropes, the sphere of expression of which is mainly oral professional speech. The specificity of lexical units that serve as a means of linguistic manipulation in disputes, as well as those that give emotionality, expressiveness, unorthodoxy to public speeches, and attract the attention of listeners, is emphasized. It is traced that the oral and written forms of scientific language, despite the presence of common features, in particular, objectivity, accuracy, argumentation, etc., have a number of different parameters. The oral form of scientific language is characterized by extensive syntactic variation, spontaneity, and the presence of some elements that give speech emotionality. In contrast, written works of various genres are characterized by a higher level of completeness, normativity, and a clear, logically and structurally motivated construction of sentences. It was found that mastery of the norms of the Ukrainian scientific language, a high level of professional communication culture, and skillful use of vocabulary serve as important factors in forming the image of a modern highly qualified researcher who is able to analyze and objectively evaluate the achievements of specialists in a certain field, effectively argue own position, and present own research results in an orderly, accurate, and understandable manner.uk_UK
dc.format.extent4779–4788-
dc.language.isoenuk_UK
dc.subjectScientific styleuk_UK
dc.subjectUkrainian scientific languageuk_UK
dc.subjectAcademic rhetoricuk_UK
dc.subjectRhetorical skiluk_UK
dc.subjectAcademic writinguk_UK
dc.subjectProfessional communicationuk_UK
dc.subjectIntercultural communicationuk_UK
dc.subjectLanguage normsuk_UK
dc.subjectCulture of the Ukrainian languageuk_UK
dc.titleCulture of Ukrainian Scientific Language: Oral and Written Forms of Professional Communicationuk_UK
dc.typeArticleuk_UK
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.64753/jcasc.v10i2.2339-
dc.citation.issue2-
dc.citation.journalTitleJournal of Cultural Analysis and Social Change-
dc.citation.volume10-
dc.relation.referencesBagan, M. (2019). Clichés in modern Ukrainian scientific discourse: cultural-linguistic and communicative aspects. Grammatical space of modern linguistic Ukrainian studies. To Kateryna Hryhorivna Gorodenska. Institute of Ukrainian Language of the NAS of Ukraine, Dmytro Burago Publishing House, pp. 367–374.uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesGorodenska, K. (2001). Syntactic specificity of the Ukrainian scientific language. Ukrainian Terminology and Modernity, IV, 11–14.uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesGorodenska, K. (2025). Renormalization in word formation of the Ukrainian literary language: causes, main manifestations, consequences. Ukrainian Language, 2, 71-84. https://doi.org/10.15407/ukrmova2025.02.071uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesHoroshkina, O., & Gruba, T. (2023). Ukrainian scientific language: theory and practice: teaching and methodological manual. Sumy: University book.uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesKoloiz, Zh. (2018). Academic writing and rhetoric. Kryvyi Rih: KDPU.uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesKostusiak, N. (2021). Academic rhetoric. Lutsk: Nadstyria.uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesKostusiak, N. (2025). Dynamic processes in Ukrainian scientific language expression. Scientific notes of V. I. Vernadsky Taurida National University. Series: Philology. Journalism, 36(75(4)), 50–55. https://doi.org/10.32782/2710-4656/2025.4.1/09.uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesKostusiak, N., Shulska, N., Kozlova, T., Lynnyk, Y., Slashchuk, A., Musiichuk, T. (2022). Features of public communication: Rhetorical skill and language manipulation. AD ALTA: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 12(2), XХІХ, 208–213. http://www.magnanimitas.cz/ADALTA/120229/papers/A_36.pdf.uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesKostusiak, N., Shulska, N., Mamosiuk, O., Polyvach, M., Kauza, I., Zavarynska, I. (2023). Variant paradigm of Ukrainian nouns in the context of codification, modern media and scientific speech. AD ALTA: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 13(1), XХХІІ, 105–114. http://www.magnanimitas.cz/ADALTA/130132/papers/A_20.pdf.uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesKots, T. (2024). Modern Ukrainian scientific text in the dimension of dynamic stability of literary norm. Scientific Notes of V. I. Vernadsky Taurida National University. Series: Philology. Journalism, 35(74(5)), 26–31. https://doi.org/10.32782/2710-4656/2024.5.1/05.uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesNovruzaliyeva, S. (2024). Priorities for success in academic communication. AD ALTA: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 14(1), 257–261. https://www.magnanimitas.cz/ADALTA/140140/papers/A_43.pdf.uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesPisarska, N., Zaveryushchenko, M., & Lukhina, M. (2023). Semantic-syntactic organization of scientific style. Scientific Notes of V. I. Vernadsky Taurida National University. Series: Philology. Journalism, 34(73(5)), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.32782/2710-4656/2023.5/05.uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesRomanchenko, A. (2019). Elite linguistic personality in the space of scientific discourse: communicative aspects. Odesa: Odessa National University named after I. I. Mechnikov.uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesSeligey, P. (2016). Light and shadows of scientific style. Kyiv: Kyiv-Mohyla Academy Publishing House.uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesSelivanova, O. O. (2008). Modern linguistics: trends and problems. Poltava: Dovkilya-Kyiv.uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesSemenog, O. (2010). Culture of the scientific Ukrainian language. Kyiv: Academy.uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesSerazhim, K. S. (2003). Discourse as a sociolinguistic phenomenon of the modern communicative space (based on the material of the political variety of Ukrainian mass information discourse). [PhD dissertation]. Kyiv.uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesShabat-Savka, S. T. (2014). Category of communicative intention in the Ukrainian language. Chernivtsi: Bukrek.uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesTkachuk, O., & Nakonechna, B. (2018). Modern Ukrainian scientific speech: a textbook. Ivano-Frankivsk: Publisher G. M. Kushnir.uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesUkrainian spelling (2019). Kyiv: Scientific opinion.uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesTurko, O. (2025). Word order as a means of linguistic influence: communicative and pragmatic aspects. Transcarpathian Philological Studies, 41(2), 55-59. https://doi.org/10.32782/tps2663-4880/2025.41.2.9.uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesVenhryniuk, M. (2025). Academic writing through the lens of narrative: The case of science popularization in the works of Robert Sapolsky. Transcarpathian Philological Studies, 41(1), 34–39. https://doi.org/10.32782/tps2663- 4880/2025.41.1.6.uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesVerbych, S. (2025). The onymic space of the modern Ukrainian language: intra- and extra-linguistic factors of stable functioning. Ukrainian Language, 2, 94-105. https://doi.org/10.15407/ukrmova2025.02.094uk_UK
Розташовується у зібраннях:Наукові роботи (FFG)

Файли цього матеріалу:
Файл Опис РозмірФормат 
JCASC-025-148110(2)4779-4788.pdf265,19 kBAdobe PDFПереглянути/відкрити


Усі матеріали в архіві електронних ресурсів захищені авторським правом, всі права збережені.