Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://evnuir.vnu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/29223
Title: Cultural differences in professional communication: academic and business contexts.
Authors: Mokhniuk, Anna
Affiliation: Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University
Bibliographic description (Ukraine): Mokhniuk A. (2025) Cultural differences in professional communication: academic and business contexts. Economic Journal of Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University, 1 (41). 160-66. https://doi.org/10.29038/2786-4618-2025-01-160-166
Journal/Collection: Economic Journal of Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University
Issue: 1 (41)
Issue Date: Apr-2025
Date of entry: 19-Nov-2025
Publisher: Economic Journal of Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University
Country (code): UA
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29038/2786-4618-2025-01-160-166
UDC: 316.74:378.4:339.13
Keywords: professional communication
intercultural differences
professional communication
academic communication
business communication
intercultural competence
digitalization
Page range: 160-166
Abstract: Introduction. Globalization has made effective professional communication essential for economists in both academic and business contexts. Cultural differences influence academic writing, business interactions, and negotiation styles, requiring adaptation to diverse communication norms. Purpose of the Article. The main objective of the article is to analyse the impact of cultural differences on professional communication in economics, focusing on both academic and business contexts. Methods. A qualitative, comparative, and interdisciplinary approach is applied, integrating Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions Theory and Erin Meyer’s Culture Map. The research integrates theoretical analysis, comparative country studies, and case-based insights to explore how economists navigate academic and business communication across diverse cultural settings. Results. The study finds that cultural differences significantly affect academic writing, negotiation styles, feedback mechanisms, and leadership approaches. The results reveal that Ukraine’s hierarchical and collectivist culture fosters formal and authority-driven communication, whereas the USA’s individualistic and low-context culture emphasizes directness and efficiency. Japan’s high-context communication relies on indirect messaging and consensus-building, while Sweden’s egalitarian approach promotes open dialogue and participatory decision-making. These differences present challenges for economists navigating academic publishing, international collaborations, and global business interactions. Conclusions. Cultural intelligence, collaborative engagement, and strategic adaptation are essential for economists to succeed in cross-cultural academic and business environments. Economists must balance local and global expectations and adapt their communication strategies. Future research should explore the role of AI-driven language tools, digital platforms, and effective strategies in shaping professional communication in economics.
URI: https://evnuir.vnu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/29223
Content type: Article
Appears in Collections:Наукові роботи (FEU)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Article_1.pdf369,98 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.