Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://evnuir.vnu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/29240
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLiashenko, Oksana-
dc.contributor.authorDemianiuk, Olga-
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-19T14:49:47Z-
dc.date.available2025-11-19T14:49:47Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifier.citationLiashenko, O., & Demianiuk, O. (2025). Economic dimensions of responsible consumer behavior in sustainable development. Економіка розвитку систем, 7(1), 71-80. https://doi.org/10.32782/2707-8019/2025-1-10uk_UK
dc.identifier.urihttps://evnuir.vnu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/29240-
dc.description.abstractAddressing the global imperative of sustainable development requires a comprehensive, data- driven understanding of how individuals make consumption decisions when personal economic incentives conflict with broader collective ecological interests. This study investigates the behavioural mechanisms underpinning responsible consumer choices by integrating social preference theory with decision- framing effects. The research employs the Quantal Response Equilibrium (QRE) framework, accommodating bounded rationality and probabilistic strategic behaviour, to model the dynamic interaction between private utility and environmental responsibility. A behavioural experiment involving 215 participants was conducted using the oTree experimental platform. The study incorporated the Social Value Orientation (SVO) Slider Measure to elicit individual prosocial preferences and a ten- round interactive “Green Consumer Game,” in which participants chose among strategies differing in personal payoff levels and ecological consequences, under either gain (reward) or loss (penalty) framing conditions. QRE- based choice probabilities were calibrated using maximum likelihood estimation of the rationality parameter within logit models implemented in Python. The empirical findings demonstrate that individuals with stronger social preferences are significantly more likely to choose environmentally responsible strategies. Framing has a robust effect: reward- based framing was considerably more effective in promoting pro- social decision- making than penalty- based framing. The QRE model achieved superior predictive accuracy compared to the classical Nash Equilibrium (RMSE 0. 069 vs. 0. 079), validating its empirical utility in ethically constrained decision contexts. This study' s novelty and theoretical value lie in applying QRE to ecologically motivated dilemmas, offering a quantitative assessment of how moral preferences and framing jointly shape consumer choice under uncertainty. Its practical contribution provides policymakers and sustainability practitioners with actionable insights for designing behavioural interventions, incentive schemes, and strategic messaging to encourage sustainable consumption across diverse socioeconomic environments.uk_UK
dc.format.extent71-80-
dc.language.isoenuk_UK
dc.publisherВидавничий дім «Гельветика»uk_UK
dc.subjectbehavioural economicsuk_UK
dc.subjectresponsible consumer behaviouruk_UK
dc.subjectsustainable developmentuk_UK
dc.subjectsocial preferencesuk_UK
dc.subjectexperimental economicsuk_UK
dc.titleEconomic dimensions of responsible consumer behavior in sustainable developmentuk_UK
dc.typeArticleuk_UK
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.32782/2707-8019/2025-1-10-
dc.citation.issue7(1)-
dc.citation.journalTitleЕкономіка розвитку систем-
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidad de Sevillauk_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationWest Ukrainian National Universityuk_UK
dc.coverage.countryUAuk_UK
Appears in Collections:Наукові роботи (FEU)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
6.pdf1,9 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.