Будь ласка, використовуйте цей ідентифікатор, щоб цитувати або посилатися на цей матеріал:
https://evnuir.vnu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/28270Повний запис метаданих
| Поле DC | Значення | Мова |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Krasnykov, Yevgen V. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Ninyuk, Inna I. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Storozhenko, Lina H. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Marukhlenko, Oksana V. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Kruhlov, Vitalii V. | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-07-15T13:29:33Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-07-15T13:29:33Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024-01-15 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Krasnykov, Y., Ninyuk, I., Storozhenko, L., Marukhlenko, O., Kruhlov, V. (2024). Impact of digital public services on governance efficiency. Telos: Revista de Estudios Interdisciplinarios en Ciencias Sociales, 26(1), 35-51. www.doi.org/10.36390/telos261.04 | uk_UK |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://evnuir.vnu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/28270 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | The impact of electronic services for citizens on the efficiency of public administration extends beyond simply digitizing bureaucratic processes. It has a positive effect on various aspects of management, ultimately increasing value for both society and the state. The purpose of the article is to quantify the degree of influence that electronic services have on several factors characterizing the public administration efficiency, utilizing the following methods: correlation analysis, factor analysis, multivariate regression, and radar method. The study found a relationship between the development level of electronic services (measured by the EGovernment Index) and various indicators of public administration efficiency. The findings showed that e-government can account for approximately 57.1% variation in these indicators, but it is important to take into consideration the significant value of the standard estimation error. The study's novelty lies in its comprehensive approach to examining the various aspects of public administration efficiency regarding the development of electronic services for the population, as well as their quantitative characteristics. Further research areas will be aimed at an in-depth investigation of e-governance's impact on sustainable development and international efficiency indicators. | uk_UK |
| dc.format.extent | 35-51 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | uk_UK |
| dc.subject | E-services | uk_UK |
| dc.subject | e-government | uk_UK |
| dc.subject | public administration efficiency | uk_UK |
| dc.subject | e-democracy | uk_UK |
| dc.subject | netocracy | uk_UK |
| dc.subject | netocratic public administration | uk_UK |
| dc.subject | information society | - |
| dc.title | Impact of digital public services on governance efficiency | uk_UK |
| dc.type | Article | uk_UK |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.36390/telos261.04 | - |
| dc.citation.issue | 1 | - |
| dc.citation.journalTitle | TELOS: Revista de Estudios Interdisciplinarios en Ciencias Sociales | - |
| dc.citation.volume | 26 | - |
| dc.relation.referencesen | Abdulkareem, A. K., Abdulkareem, Z. J., Ishola, A. A., & Akindele, I. T. (2022). Does egovernment impact e-participation? The influence of trust in egovernment. International Review of Public Administration, 27(2), 91-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2022.2071540 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.referencesen | Addo, A., & Senyo, P. K. (2021). Advancing E-governance for development: Digital identification and its link to socioeconomic inclusion. Government Information Quarterly, 38(2), 101568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101568 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.referencesen | Ali, B. J., & Anwar, G. (2021). Factors influencing the citizens’ acceptance of electronic government. International Journal of Engineering, Business and Management (IJEBM), 5(1), 48-60. https://dx.doi.org/10.22161/ijebm.5.1.5 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.referencesen | Almaiah, M. A., & Nasereddin, Y. (2020). Factors influencing the adoption of e-government services among Jordanian citizens. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 16(3), 236-259. https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2020.108453 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.referencesen | Alruwaie, M., El-Haddadeh, R., & Weerakkody, V. (2020). Citizens' continuous use of eGovernment services: The role of self-efficacy, outcome expectations and Impact of digital public services on governance efficiency 50 satisfaction. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3),101485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101485 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.referencesen | Andersen, L. B., Christensen, M., Danholt, P., & Lauritsen, P. (2023). The role of digital data on citizens in social work research: A literature review. The British Journal of Social Work, 53(2), 848-865. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcac158 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.referencesen | Bakon, K. A., Elias, N. F., & Abusamhadana, G. A. (2020). Culture and digital divide influence on e-government success of developing countries: A literature review. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 98(09), 1362-1378. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3762293 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.referencesen | Balisany, W., Özgit, H., & Rjoub, H. (2022). The Nexus among good e-governance practice, decentralization, and public administration for sustainable local development. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2022, 9886372. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9886372 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.referencesen | Chen, L., & Aklikokou, A. K. (2021). Relating e-government development to government effectiveness and control of corruption: a cluster analysis. Journal of Chinese Governance, 6(1), 155-173. https://doi.org/10.1080/23812346.2019.1698693 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.referencesen | Criado, J. I., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2019). Creating public value through smart technologies and strategies: From digital services to artificial intelligence and beyond. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 32(5), 438-450. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-07-2019-0178 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.referencesen | Gaisynuik, N. (2022). Document management culture as a technology of effective public governance. Issues in Cultural Studies, 39, 112-127. https://doi.org/10.31866/2410-1311.39.2022.256906 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.referencesen | Helliwell, J. F., Layard, R., Sachs, J. D., De Neve, J.-E., Aknin, L. B., & Wang, S. (2022). World Happiness Report 2022. https://happinessreport.s3.amazonaws.com/2022/WHR+22.pdf | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.referencesen | IMD. (2022). World Competitiveness Ranking. https://www.imd.org/centers/wcc/worldcompetitiveness-center/rankings/world-competitiveness-ranking/ | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.referencesen | International Budget Partnership. (2021). Open Budget Survey 2021. https://internationalbudget.org/wp-content/uploads/Open-budget-survey-2021- 1.pdf | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.referencesen | International IDEA. (2022). Global State of Democracy Report 2022: Forging Social Contracts in a Time of Discontent. https://idea.int/democracytracker/gsod-report2022#chapter2.3 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.referencesen | Ju, J., Liu, L., & Feng, Y. (2019). Public and private value in citizen participation in E-governance: Evidence from a government-sponsored green commuting platform. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101400 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.referencesen | Lindgren, I., Madsen, C. Ø., Hofmann, S., & Melin, U. (2019). Close encounters of the digital kind: A research agenda for the digitalization of public services. Government Information Quarterly, 36(3), 427-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.03.002 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.referencesen | Ma, L., & Zheng, Y. (2019). National e-government performance and citizen satisfaction: a multilevel analysis across European countries. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 85(3), 506-526. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852317703691 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.referencesen | MacLean, D., & Titah, R. (2022). A systematic literature review of empirical research on the impacts of e‐government: a public value perspective. Public Administration Review, 82(1), 23-38. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13413 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.referencesen | Melnychuk, N. (2020). The problem of e-services’ popularization in Ukraine. Visnuk of the Lviv University. Series Philos.-Political Studies, 31, 173-179. https://doi.org/10.30970/PPS.2020.31.22 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.referencesen | Mokhova, Yu. (2020). Theoretical foundations of the development of the electronic governance mechanism in Ukraine. Scientific Perspectives, 5(5), 386-395. https://doi.org/10.32689/2708-7530-2020-5(5)-386-395 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.referencesen | Shcherbyna, Ye. M. (2022). Characteristics of the procedure for providing electronic services in the system of public services in Ukraine. Dnipro Scientific Journal of Public Administration, Psychology, Law, 4, 185-189. https://doi.org/10.51547/ppp.dp.ua/2022.4.28 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.referencesen | Sriyakul, T., Chankoson, T., & Sukpasjaroen, K. (2022). Modelling the impact of e-government on corruption for the Covid-19 crisis. International Journal of eBusiness and eGovernment Studies, 14(3), 26-45. https://doi.org/10.34111/ijebeg.202214181 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.referencesen | Storozhenko, L. (2023). “Electronic government” as an integrated platform for the formation of non-democratic public administration: the experience of Estonia. Public Management and Digital Practices, 1, 183-198 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.referencesen | Sydorenko, N. (2021). Digitalization: Electronic administrative services. Dnipro Scientific Journal of Public Administration, Psychology, Law, 4, 11-15. https://doi.org/10.51547/ppp.dp.ua/2021.4.2 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.referencesen | The World Bank. (2023). Ease of Doing Business rankings 2020. https://archive.doingbusiness.org/en/rankings | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.referencesen | Transparency International. (2023). Corruption Perceptions Index 2022. https://images.transparencycdn.org/images/CPI2022-Report-Embargoed-until6.01am-CET-31-JANUARY-2023.pdf | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.referencesen | Twizeyimana, J. D., & Andersson, A. (2019). The public value of E-Government–A literature review. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 167-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.01.001 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.referencesen | Ullah, A., Pinglu, C., Ullah, S., Abbas, H. S. M., & Khan, S. (2021). The role of e-governance in combating COVID-19 and promoting sustainable development: A comparative study of China and Pakistan. Chinese Political Science Review, 6(1), 86-118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-020-00167-w | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.referencesen | United Nations. (2022). E-Government Survey 2022. https://desapublications.un.org/sites/default/files/publications/2022- 09/Web%20version%20E-Government%202022.pdf | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.referencesen | WIPO. (2022). Global Innovation Index 2022: What is the future of innovation-driven growth? https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo-pub-2000-2022-en-main-reportglobal-innovation-index-2022-15th-edition.pdf | uk_UK |
| Розташовується у зібраннях: | Наукові роботи (FH) | |
Файли цього матеріалу:
| Файл | Опис | Розмір | Формат | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| telos261.04.pdf | 358,51 kB | Adobe PDF | Переглянути/відкрити |
Усі матеріали в архіві електронних ресурсів захищені авторським правом, всі права збережені.