Будь ласка, використовуйте цей ідентифікатор, щоб цитувати або посилатися на цей матеріал:
https://evnuir.vnu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/28212
Повний запис метаданих
Поле DC | Значення | Мова |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Ninyuk, Inna I. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-07-09T12:11:28Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2025-07-09T12:11:28Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2025-06 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Ninyuk I. Development of e-governance as a tool for increasing transparency and accountability of government in Ukraine. Knowledge, Education, Law, Management. 2025. № 2(70). P. 84–90. DOI : https://doi.org/10.51647/kelm.2025.2.11. | uk_UK |
dc.identifier.uri | https://evnuir.vnu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/28212 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The study assessed the development of e-governance tools in enhancing transparency and accountability within the government of Ukraine. Ukraine’s efforts to combat corruption have become particularly notable, especially by reinforcing anti-corruption frameworks. Successful investigations, enforcement measures, and resulting convictions reflect the government’s firm commitment to addressing corruption. Despite these measures, Ukraine was ranked 105th out of 180 countries in the 2024 Corruption Perceptions Index. The study’s main objective was to evaluate the development of such tools and their impact on governance outcomes. A secondary research approach was employed, relying on existing data sources and utilising content analysis as the primary analytical method. The findings indicate, among other things, that platforms such as Diia and Prozorro have significantly contributed to enhanced accountability, efficiency, costeffectiveness, and transparency in governmental operations. kraine has increased public trust in state institutions. through digitalising public services processes. | uk_UK |
dc.format.extent | 84-90 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | uk_UK |
dc.subject | corruption | uk_UK |
dc.subject | e-procurement | uk_UK |
dc.subject | framework | uk_UK |
dc.subject | public trust | uk_UK |
dc.subject | digitisation | uk_UK |
dc.subject | service delivery | uk_UK |
dc.title | Development of e-governance as a tool for increasing transparency and accountability of government in Ukraine | uk_UK |
dc.type | Article | uk_UK |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.51647/kelm.2025.2.11 | - |
dc.citation.issue | 2(70) | - |
dc.citation.journalTitle | Knowledge, Education, Law, Management | - |
dc.coverage.country | PL | uk_UK |
dc.relation.referencesen | Bannister, F., & Connolly,R. (2011). The Trouble with Transparency: A Critical Review of Openness in e-Government.Policy & Internet, 3(1), 158–187. https://doi.org/10.2202/1944-2866.1076 | uk_UK |
dc.relation.referencesen | Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010). Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 264–271. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.00 | uk_UK |
dc.relation.referencesen | Boehm, F., & Olaya, J. (2006). Corruption in public contracting auctions: The role of transparency in bidding processes.Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 77(4), 431–452. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8292.2006.00314.x | uk_UK |
dc.relation.referencesen | Clarke, A. (2020). Digital government units: what are they, and what do they mean for digital era public management renewal? International Public Management Journal : IPMJ, 23(3), 358–379. doi: 10.1080/10967494.2019.1686447 | uk_UK |
dc.relation.referencesen | Cost of corruption – GIACC. (2024, April 8). Retrieved April 14, 2025, from Giaccentre.org website: https://giaccentre. org/the-cost-of-corruption/ | uk_UK |
dc.relation.referencesen | Cruz Romero, R. (2023). Defining transparency: A functional approach. JeDEM – eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, 15(1), 219–242. doi: 10.29379/jedem.v15i1.714 | uk_UK |
dc.relation.referencesen | Daud, S. H., Mzin, M., Shamsuddin, W. F. W., & Othman, K. (2020). Implementation of e-government 2.0 In Malaysian ministries: Towards a conceptual research framework. International Journal of Business and Economy, 2(4), 115–130. https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/ijbec/article/view/11668 | uk_UK |
dc.relation.referencesen | Dwangu, A. M., & Mahlangu, V. P. (2021). Accountability in the financial management practices of school principals. International Journal of Educational Management, 35(7), 1504–1524. doi: 10.1108/ijem-06-2021-0243 | uk_UK |
dc.relation.referencesen | European Commission. (2023). Commission staff working document Ukraine 2023 report accompanying the document communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions communications on EU enlargement policy SWD. Brussels: European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52023SC0699 | uk_UK |
dc.relation.referencesen | Heeks, R. (2016). Implementing and managing e-government. Sage Publications. https://sk.sagepub.com/book/mono/ implementing-and-managing-egovernment/toc | uk_UK |
dc.relation.referencesen | Ishengoma, F., & Shao, D. (2025). A framework for aligning e-government initiatives with the sustainable development goals. Journal of Innovative Digital Transformation, 2(1), 73–89. doi:10.1108/jidt-09-2024-0025 | uk_UK |
dc.relation.referencesen | Kalitenko, O. (2023, June 13). Anti-corruption reform in Ukraine after Russia’s full-scale invasion (SCEEUS Report No. 13). Stockholm Centre for Eastern European Studies. https://sceeus.se/en/publications/anti-corruption-reform-inukraine-after-russias-full-scale-invasion/ | uk_UK |
dc.relation.referencesen | Kholid, M. N., & Sari, D. N. (2022). Determinant of citizens’ acceptance of E-government: Examining semi-online tax filing system in Indonesia. Webology, 19(1), 2104–2121. doi: 10.14704/web/v19i1/web19142 | uk_UK |
dc.relation.referencesen | Klitgaard, R. (2015). Addressing corruption through better governance and transparency. World Bank Policy Paper. | uk_UK |
dc.relation.referencesen | Kumar, R., Sachan, A., & Mukherjee, A. (2025). Adoption of e-government services at different maturity levels: a qualitative study in India. Digital Policy Regulation and Governance, 25(1), 15–39. doi: 10.1108/dprg-09-2021-0116 | uk_UK |
dc.relation.referencesen | Lennon, O. (2023). Why the west should localize anti-corruption efforts in Ukraine. Retrieved April 14, 2025, from PONARS Eurasia website: https://www.ponarseurasia.org/why-the-west-should-localize-anti-corruption-efforts-in-ukraine/ | uk_UK |
dc.relation.referencesen | Li, X., & Ding, Y. (2020). Holistic governance for sustainable public services: Reshaping government-enterprise relationships in china’s digital government context. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5), 1778. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051778 | uk_UK |
dc.relation.referencesen | Lindstedt, C., & Naurin, D. (2010). Transparency is not Enough: Making Transparency Effective in Reducing Corruption. International Political Science Review, 31(3), 301–322. doi: 10.1177/0192512110377602 | uk_UK |
dc.relation.referencesen | Malodia, S., Dhir, A., Mishra, M., & Bhatti, Z. A. (2021). Future of e-Government: An integrated conceptual framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173(121102), 121102. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121102 | uk_UK |
dc.relation.referencesen | Meijer, A. (2015). Government transparency in historical perspective: From the ancient regime to open data in the Netherlands. International Journal of Public Administration, 38(3), 189–199. doi: 10.1080/01900692.2014.934837 | uk_UK |
dc.relation.referencesen | Milakovich, M. E. (2021). The transition from electronic government to smart digital governance. In Digital Governance (pp. 26–54). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003215875-2 | uk_UK |
dc.relation.referencesen | National Agency on Corruption Prevention. (2020). Anti-corruption strategy for 2021–2025. https://www.nazk.gov.ua/ assets/eu-strategy/Anti-corruption-Strategy-for-2021-2025.pdf | uk_UK |
dc.relation.referencesen | Nimko, O., Ohorodnyk, V., Dankevych, V., & Doronina, I. (2024). E-governance and corruption perception: Global insights and Ukraine’s context during war and displacement. Pakistan Journal of Criminology, (16.3), 223–244. doi: 10.62271/ pjc.16.3.223.244 | uk_UK |
dc.relation.referencesen | O’Regan, G. (2021). A brief history of computing. Springer Nature | uk_UK |
dc.relation.referencesen | Padua, M. G. (2020). Revealing late 20th century hybrid modernity. In Hybrid Modernity (pp. 105–195). Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge, 2020. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315587684-5 | uk_UK |
dc.relation.referencesen | Rachmawati, T., & Dwi Fitriyanti, K. (2021). Analysis of the E-government initiative at local government level in Bandung city, Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 25(1), 62-80. doi: 10.22146/jsp.58966 | uk_UK |
dc.relation.referencesen | Ramzy, M., & Ibrahim, B. (2024). The evolution of e-government research over two decades: applying bibliometrics and science mapping analysis. Library Hi Tech, 42(1), 227–260. doi: 10.1108/lht-02-2022-0100 | uk_UK |
dc.relation.referencesen | Sabani, A. (2021). Investigating the influence of transparency on the adoption of e-Government in Indonesia. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 12(2), 236–255. doi: 10.1108/jstpm-03-2020-0046 | uk_UK |
dc.relation.referencesen | Shava, E., & Vyas-Doorgapersad, S. (2023). Inclusive participation in information and communication technologies (ICTs) processes for smart services in the city of Johannesburg. Insights into Regional Development, 5(1), 26–40. doi: 10.9770/ ird.2023.5.1(2) | uk_UK |
dc.relation.referencesen | Transparency International. (2024). Corruption Perceptions Index 2024. https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2024 | uk_UK |
dc.relation.referencesen | United Nations. (2020, September 24). Hundreds of billions of dollars lost to governments due to financial crime that could be spent on social development. https://news.un.org/ru/story/2020/09/1386622 | uk_UK |
dc.relation.referencesen | Vuorenmaa, E. (2024). From distrust to trust: Balancing between forcing and fostering management control systems in a hostile cross-border post-acquisition integration. Management Accounting Research, 64(100889), 100889. doi:10.1016/j. mar.2024.100889 | uk_UK |
dc.relation.referencesen | World Bank. (2019). Ukraine’s e-procurement reform and its impact on corruption reduction. Washington, D.C: World Bank | uk_UK |
Розташовується у зібраннях: | Наукові роботи (FH) |
Файли цього матеріалу:
Файл | Опис | Розмір | Формат | |
---|---|---|---|---|
kelm.2025.2.11.pdf | 467,53 kB | Adobe PDF | Переглянути/відкрити |
Усі матеріали в архіві електронних ресурсів захищені авторським правом, всі права збережені.