Будь ласка, використовуйте цей ідентифікатор, щоб цитувати або посилатися на цей матеріал: https://evnuir.vnu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/20615
Повний запис метаданих
Поле DCЗначенняМова
dc.contributor.authorTabari, Fatemeh-
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-15T09:00:49Z-
dc.date.available2022-07-15T09:00:49Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationTabari, F. Lexicon on Board: A MEG Study Based on Expressive Picture-Naming/ F.Tabari // East European Journal of Psycholinguistics / Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University. – Lutsk, 2021. – Volume 8, Number 2 – P. 233-254.https://doi.org/10.29038/eejpl.2021.8.2.tabuk_UK
dc.identifier.urihttps://evnuir.vnu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/20615-
dc.description.abstractNo task can better depict the path underlying word production in human brain than picture naming as it covers all the stages of production from visual analysis to motor execution. Nevertheless, the cognitive processes associated with word retrieval and the investigation on word-picture differences are complex and not fully understood. Uttering a word entails orchestrating several steps as visual object recognition, accessing a lexical concept, lemma selection, lemma retrieval, accessing the morpheme(s) and generating the phonological word, and finally retrieving syllabic gestural scores and articulation. Moreover, it is already known that the brain function is not the outcome of isolated regions but the network of regions interacting with each other. To study the mechanisms of word retrieval in lemma selection phase, we compared the three groups of monolingual, semi-bilingual and bilingual learners Spanish-English speakers through a functional neuroimaging technique with respect to their topography and strength of Functional Connectivity (FC) values of the most highlighted pair of activated nodes in the time range of 0-150 ms in different frequency bands (delta, theta, alpha, beta, and. gamma) upon application of the stimuli. We have seen no significant difference between difference frequency bands (p > .05) at the most highlighted FC pairs. However, we observed higher gamma values signifying the semantic activation of the word. We could not find any significant difference between the three groups in terms of FC values at designated pairs of nodes signifying that different amount of exposure could not affect electrophysiological patterns in the preliminary step of word production.uk_UK
dc.format.extent233-254-
dc.language.isoenuk_UK
dc.publisherLesya Ukrainka Volyn National Universityuk_UK
dc.subjectlexiconuk_UK
dc.subjectMEGuk_UK
dc.subjectpicture naminguk_UK
dc.subjectmonolingualuk_UK
dc.subjectsemi-bilingualuk_UK
dc.subjectbilingualuk_UK
dc.subjectContent and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL)uk_UK
dc.titleLexicon on Board: A MEG Study Based on Expressive Picture-Naminguk_UK
dc.typeArticleuk_UK
dc.rights.holderEast European Journal of Psycholinguisticsuk_UK
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.29038/eejpl.2021.8.2.tab-
dc.citation.journalTitleEast European Journal of Psycholinguistics-
dc.contributor.affiliationAutonomous University of Madrid, Spainuk_UK
dc.coverage.countryUAuk_UK
Розташовується у зібраннях:East European Journal of Psycholinguistics, 2021, Volume 8, Number 2

Файли цього матеріалу:
Файл Опис РозмірФормат 
zasiekina,+17+++Tabari,+Fatemeh.pdf660,18 kBAdobe PDFПереглянути/відкрити


Усі матеріали в архіві електронних ресурсів захищені авторським правом, всі права збережені.