Будь ласка, використовуйте цей ідентифікатор, щоб цитувати або посилатися на цей матеріал: https://evnuir.vnu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/22044
Повний запис метаданих
Поле DCЗначенняМова
dc.contributor.authorKostusiak, Nataliia-
dc.contributor.authorShulska, Nataliia-
dc.contributor.authorMamosiuk, Olena-
dc.contributor.authorPolyvach, Mariia-
dc.contributor.authorKauza, Iryna-
dc.contributor.authorZavarynska, Iryna-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-20T10:03:58Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-20T10:03:58Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationKostusiak N., Shulska N., Mamosiuk O., Polyvach M., Kauza I., Zavarynska I. Variant Paradigm of Ukrainian Nouns in the Context of Codification, Modern Media and Scientific Speech. Ad Alta. 2023. Vol. 13, Iss. 1, Spec. Iss. XХXII. P. 105–114.uk_UK
dc.identifier.urihttps://evnuir.vnu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/22044-
dc.description.abstractThe article analyzes the paradigmatic types of nouns in the context of the reform of Ukrainian spelling, highlights the codified variants of the four declensions of nouns, characterizes the trends of their functional manifestation in modern media and scientific communication, in particular, distinguishes the dominant forms that are less used and not used in journalistic publications (“Gazeta po-Ukrainsky”, “Day”, “Competitor”) and the specialized scientific and theoretical magazine “Ukrainian Language”. The study of morphological variants of the first declension made it possible to include the majority of lexemes with a zero ending among the more frequent ones, and morphological synonyms, usually with the inflection of -ів (-iv), among the less used ones. The investigated corpus of factual material proved the uneven functioning of the variant forms of the second declension recommended in “Ukrainian Spelling” in media and linguistic speech. In journalistic and scientific texts, there is an established tendency to predominate in the dative and locative cases of nominations of beings with the endings -ові, -еві (-ovi, -evi) and names of non- beings with the inflection -y. So far, the names of people proposed in the new edition of “Ukrainian Spelling” have not been recorded with endings in the local case, for example (при) Олесі, Євгені, Івані. Speech practice has shown that journalistic and scientific sources show different frequency of use of variants regulated in the “Ukrainian Spelling” with inflections -і and -и, characteristic of nouns of the third declension on -ть, as well as several other substantives in the genitive singular. In media publications, long-established forms with the ending -i prevail, variants with inflection -и are usually single, but they are actively used in professional linguistic publications. It was found that the grammatical synonymy of nouns of the fourth declension is implemented by forms with the ending -я and the possible suffix -ен-. In the corpus of research material, nouns with this service formant dominate. Instead, their correlates without this suffix are either rarely used or absent altogether. The method of describing parallel forms of nouns in the context of codification and modern language practice proposed in the article is promising for the study of case variants of other variable parts of speech.uk_UK
dc.format.extent105–114-
dc.language.isoenuk_UK
dc.subjectUkrainian languageuk_UK
dc.subjectcaseuk_UK
dc.subjectnounuk_UK
dc.subjectendinguk_UK
dc.subjectsuffixuk_UK
dc.subjectvariant formsuk_UK
dc.subjectlanguage of mass mediauk_UK
dc.subjectprofessional speechuk_UK
dc.titleVariant Paradigm of Ukrainian Nouns in the Context of Codification, Modern Media and Scientific Speechuk_UK
dc.typeArticleuk_UK
dc.coverage.countryCZuk_UK
dc.relation.references1. Bagan, M. P. (2020). Anglicization of the modern Ukrainian- speaking communicative space: Causes, main manifestations and consequences. Ukrainian Language, 1(73), 38–53. https://doi.o rg/10.15407/ukrmova2020.01.038.uk_UK
dc.relation.references2. Horodenska, K. G. (2021). Grammatical forms of addresses in the communicative space of Ukrainian public radio. Studia Ukrainica Varsoviensia, 9, 9–17.uk_UK
dc.relation.references3. Kolibaba, L. (2014). Variant case endings of nouns against the background of morphological norms of the Ukrainian literary language of the late 20th – early 21st centuries. Ukrainian Language, 1(49), 86–96.uk_UK
dc.relation.references4. Kolibaba, L. (2018). Morphological forms of nouns in the context of the theory of language norms. Ukrainian Language, 2(66), 50–65.uk_UK
dc.relation.references5. Kolibaba, L. (2021). Changes in the normalization of case endings of nouns against the background of modern language practice of the Ukrainian professional community. Linguistic Studies, 41, 36–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.31558/1815- 3070.2021.41.4.uk_UK
dc.relation.references6. Kostusiak, N. M. (2022). Orthographic variants of loanwords in the Ukrainian language: modern linguistic practice. Modern trends in the development of science in the conditions of European integration: Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference. Vinnytsia: Vinnytsia Cooperative Institute, pp. 186–189.uk_UK
dc.relation.references7. Kostusiak, N., Navalna, M., Levchenko, T., Grozian, N., Pryimachok, O., Prudnykova, T. (2021). Functional-Semantic and Derivative Signs of Nominations of Covid and its Synonymic Correspondents in the Latest Media Discourse. AD ALTA: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 11(2), Spec. Issue XХI, 191–196. http://www.magnanimitas.cz/ADALTA/110221 /PDF/110221.pdf.uk_UK
dc.relation.references8. Kostusiak, N., Navalna, M., & Mezhov, O. (2020). The Functional-Cognitive Category of Femininity in Modern Ukrainian. Cognitive Studies / Études cognitives, 20, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.11649/cs.2310.uk_UK
dc.relation.references9. Modern Ukrainian literary language: Morphology. I. K. Bilodyd (Ed.). Kyiv: Naukova dumka, 1969.uk_UK
dc.relation.references10. Stepanenko, M. (2022). Methodological principles of Ukrainian spelling: diachronic-synchronic dimension. Materials of the II International Slavic Conference dedicated to the memory of Saints Cyril and Methodius. Kharkiv, Shumen: KhNPU; HIFT, pp. 161–172.uk_UK
dc.relation.references11. Ukrainian spelling (2019). Kyiv: Scientific opinion. http://www.inmo.org.ua/news/ukrainian-pravopis.uk_UK
dc.relation.references12. Vyhovanets, I. R. (2003). Dynamic processes in Ukrainian noun declension. Ukrainian Language, 3–4, 33–37.uk_UK
dc.relation.references13. Vyhovanets, I. R., Horodenska, K. G., Zagnitko, A. P., Sokolova, S. O. (2017). Grammar of modern Ukrainian literary language. Morphology. Kyiv: Dmytro Burago Publishing House.uk_UK
Розташовується у зібраннях:Наукові роботи (FFG)

Файли цього матеріалу:
Файл Опис РозмірФормат 
A_20.pdf449,17 kBAdobe PDFПереглянути/відкрити


Усі матеріали в архіві електронних ресурсів захищені авторським правом, всі права збережені.